They are not always about minority groups or less the powerful e.g. ‘upper class twits’
Perkins saw that most stereotypes were
aimed at the lower/ working classes therefore she argued that the upper classes
could always be treated in the same way. Within hotel
Babylon we can see that there are stereotypes that are focused on other
groups, not
just the migrant workers. An example of this is the officers that storm the
building who are represented as careless and horrible by the way they show no
emotion and take one of the workers away from his loved ones.
They
can be held about ones own group
Perkins saw that even in larger groups of
people stereotypes can still be made about each other by the people in said
group, even though they
hold the
same believes and ideologies just on assumption. We can see
in hotel Babylon
that
groups of people aren't always
held to
their own stereotype, this is shown by the way that the migrants are
represented as more of an intelligent, useful workforce and therefore break
their stereotype and gain respect from the audience.
They
are not rigid or unchanging
In Hotel Babylon that stereotypes change within different
characters,
as the people who work in the hotel treat the immigrants with respect, whereas
the officers don’t
care how they treat the migrants and just throw them about.
They
are not always false
From the scene where the migrant officers
catch an immigrant, we can see that the stereotype of them being mean is true,
as is it their job to catch them, and if they weren't being thoughtless in this
clip then their role would be pointless.
No comments:
Post a Comment